1995 Tenth Circuit US Court of Appeals Case Law

Opinions 501 - 1000 of 1562

Alexander Hernandez, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of New Mexico, Public Defender Department; Jacquelynrobins; Reginald Storment, Individually and in His Formerofficial Capacity As District Defender of the Publicdefender Department of the State of New Mexico; Gloriamccary, Individually and in Her Former Official Capacity Asattorney for the Public Defender Department of the State Ofnew Mexico; Karen Converse, Individually and in Herofficial Capacity As Attorney for the Public Defenderdepartment of the State of New Mexico; David Eisenburg,individually and in His Official Capacity As Attorney Forthe Public Defender Department of the State of New Mexico;anthony Rivera; Ralph Oldenwald, Individually and in Hisofficial Capacity As District Defender of the State of Newmexico; Jerry Dickinson, Individually and in His Officialcapacity As Hearing Officer for the Personnel Board of Thestate of New Mexico; Andrew Lopez, Also Known As Andreslopez, Individually and in His Official Capacity As Areadirector of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Ofthe United States Government in the State of New Mexico;david W. Morris, Individually and in His Official Capacityas Investigator for the Equal Employment Opportunitycommission of the United States Government in the State Ofnew Mexico; Sarah E. Alley, Individually and in Herofficial Capacity As Assistant Attorney General of the Stateof New Mexico; Kennis Berard, Individually and in Hisofficial Capacity As Administrative Law Judge for the Statepersonnel Board of the State of New Mexico, Defendants-appellees
Date: August 16, 1995
Citation: 64 F.3d 669
No. 95-2065.d.c. No. Civ 92-1175 Elm/wwd
Date: August 8, 1995
Citation: 62 F.3d 1428
Jane L. v. Bangerter
Date: August 2, 1995
Citation: 61 F.3d 1493
No. 94-2276.(d.c. No. Civ 94-0409-hb)
Date: June 8, 1995
Citation: 57 F.3d 1080
U.S. v. Carl R. Kennedy
Date: June 5, 1995
Citation: 56 F.3d 78
No. 94-1259
Date: May 31, 1995
Citation: 55 F.3d 1503

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.