Azubuko v. Irish, No. 11-6202 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CasePetitioner Chuwuma Azubuko appealed the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint for lack of venue. Petitioner filed a complaint in the Western District of Oklahoma alleging Latoya Irish and an unknown Boston police detective violated his constitutional rights. He complained that Irish denied his subsidized housing application and that the detective warned him not to contact Irish. Plaintiff sought $21.4 million in damages. According to the complaint, Plaintiff, Irish and the unknown detective all resided in Massachusetts. Further, the apartment at issue is located in Massachusetts. Plaintiff did not allege any facts connecting the dispute to the Western District of Oklahoma. The district court noted that Plaintiff had been placed under filing restrictions in the District of Massachusetts, and that Plaintiff had "a history of attempting to circumvent the Orders enjoining him by filing his lawsuits in other Districts, only to have them transferred to the District of Massachusetts." Upon review, the Tenth Circuit found that "[Plaintiff] spen[t] the bulk of his appellate brief arguing that the district court possessed jurisdiction over his action. 'Venue, however, is distinct from jurisdiction.'" The Court agreed that venue was improper, and that Plaintiff's action should have been dismissed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.