M.m., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarlysituated, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Aristedes W. Zavaras, Executive Director of the Coloradodepartment of Corrections, in His Officialcapacity, Defendant-appellee, 98 F.3d 1349 (10th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore PORFILIO and HENRY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT1
After examining the documents filed in connection with this appeal, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant has filed with this court an emergency application for stay pending appeal of the denial of her motion to proceed in pseudonym. Because this is not a final, appealable order, we decline to rule on the application, Desktop Direct, Inc. v. Digital Equipment Corp. 993 F.2d 755, 760 (10th Cir. 1993), and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Id.
DISMISSED.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
