Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.ivan Stroh, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 97 F.3d 1457 (8th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 97 F.3d 1457 (8th Cir. 1996) Submitted Sept. 25, 1996. Decided Oct. 2, 1996

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Having searched the record and considered the parties' briefs, we find no merit in Stroh's contentions. Stroh failed to show "new evidence" likely to produce a different result on retrial, prejudice attributable to counsel's claimed deficiencies, or the prosecutor's knowing use of perjured testimony. We also conclude the district court correctly denied relief on Stroh's sentencing claim. Finally, we do not reach arguments Stroh raises for the first time on appeal. We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.