William Donald Harvey, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Huffman, Defendant-appellee, 87 F.3d 1319 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 87 F.3d 1319 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted June 11, 1996. *Decided June 19, 1996

Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

William Donald Harvey, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Robert Huffman in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We vacate and remand pursuant to Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988), because the district court failed to advise Harvey of the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. See Arreola v. Mangaong, 65 F.3d 801, 802 (9th Cir. 1995).

VACATED and REMANDED.1 

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

 1

Because of our disposition of this appeal, we do not consider the applicability, if any, of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996), to this appeal

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.