Harold Pittman, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Rebecca E. Stallings; Glenn S. Dixon, Executor of Theestate of Glenn W. Dixon, Jr.; Dixon Lumbercompany, Incorporated, Defendants-appellees, 8 F.3d 819 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
Rubin Thayer Rivers, Jr., for Appellant.
Rebecca E. Stallings, Appellee Pro Se; Stephen McQuiston Hodges, PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, for Appellees.
Before PHILLIPS, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Harold Pittman appeals from the district court's order granting judgment to Defendants as a matter of law. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pittman v. Stallings, No. CA-91-57-A (W.D. Va. Nov. 10, 1992). We deny Pittman's motion to submit formal brief and for oral argument, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
