Wallace S. Davis, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Glynis Smith; Paramount Studios; Jefferson Pilotbroadcasting Company, Channel 12; Sergeant Berry;virginia Department of Corrections,defendants-appellees, 8 F.3d 817 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 8 F.3d 817 (4th Cir. 1993) Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-91-747-AM)Submitted: SeDL Decided: October 28, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Wallace S. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Ira C. Wolpert, Foley & Lardner, Washington, D.C.; James LeRoy Banks, Jr., Christian, Barton, Epps, Brent & Chappell, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D. Va.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL*  and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Motion for Production and Discovery. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable.*  North Carolina Ass'n of Black Lawyers v. North Carolina Bd. of Law Examiners, 538 F.2d 547 (4th Cir. 1976). This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 *

Judge Russell did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (1988)

 *

Because of this lack of jurisdiction, we must also refuse Appellant's requests for appointment of counsel, change of venue, establishment of a trial date, and award of damages and other requested relief

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.