Judith S. Barnett, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Krystal Cadillac-olds-gmctruck, Incorporated; Harry Pappas;john Sykas, Defendants-appellees,andkrystal Cadillac-olds-gmc, Defendant, 8 F.3d 816 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Judith S. Barnett, Appellant Pro Se.
G. Randall Whittenberger, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, for Appellees.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (6) and 56 all claims stated in this diversity action arising from Appellees' repossession of Appellant's husband's truck. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and entering final judgment discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barnett v. Krystal Cadillac, No. CA-91-2541-JFM (D. Md. June 15, 1992; Sept. 30, 1992; Apr. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
