Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.peter X. Cunningham, Plaintiff-appellant, v. C.e. Thompson; C. Hester, Assistant Warden; S.l. Batts,assistant Warden; S.r. Whitten, Grievancecoordinator; Doctor Shelton; Doctorwray; Nurse Blakely,defendants-appellees, 76 F.3d 372 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 76 F.3d 372 (4th Cir. 1996) Submitted Jan. 18, 1996. Decided Feb. 1, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1042)

Peter X. Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Sandra Morris Holleran, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cunningham v. Thompson, No. CA-94-1042 (E.D. Va. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.