David S. Penner; Jason W. Penner, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. United States Postal Service, Defendant-appellee, 74 F.3d 1233 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseDavid S. Penner, Jason W. Penner, Appellants Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Gill Paul Beck, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the magistrate judge's order denying relief in a contract dispute with the United States Postal Service.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Penner v. United States Postal Service, No. CA-93-489-2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
