Tides Jerry Newton, Iii; James Edward May, Ii, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Richard Young, Reg. Administrator; Sergeant Pruitt;mosley, Correctional Officer; E.b. Walker, Major; Dow,correctional Officer; Lieutenant White; R.m. Landon;sergeant Whitehead; O.b. White, Lieutenant, Defendants-appellees, 74 F.3d 1232 (4th Cir. 1996)Annotate this Case
Tides Jerry Newton, III, James Edward May, II, Appellants Pro Se.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Newton v. Young, No. CA-95-829-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.