Robert Lee Brock, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Michale Roach, Defendant--appellee.robert Lee Brock, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Robert T. Garnett, Defendant--appellee, 74 F.3d 1230 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 74 F.3d 1230 (4th Cir. 1996)

Jan. 17, 1996


Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.


Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. No. 95-7377, Brock v. Roach, No. CA-95-775-R; No. 95-7400, Brock v. Garnett, No. CA-95-778 (W.D. Va. Aug. 8 & 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED