Leo L. Maddox, Plaintiff-appellant, v. David Odom, Hearing Officer; Maria Blandshaw, I.a.c. Staffcoordinator, in Their Official and Individualcapacities, Defendants-appellees, 73 F.3d 358 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseLeo L. Maddox, Appellant Pro Se.
Leslie Arlen Cotter, Jr., Benjamin Davis McCoy, Richardson, Plowden, Grier & Howser, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maddox v. Odom, No. CA-94-1835-3-18BC (D.S.C. June 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
