Leo L. Maddox, Plaintiff-appellant, v. David Odom, Hearing Officer; Maria Blandshaw, I.a.c. Staffcoordinator, in Their Official and Individualcapacities, Defendants-appellees, 73 F.3d 358 (4th Cir. 1996)Annotate this Case
Submitted: Dec. 14, 1995. Decided: Jan. 4, 1996
Leo L. Maddox, Appellant Pro Se.
Leslie Arlen Cotter, Jr., Benjamin Davis McCoy, Richardson, Plowden, Grier & Howser, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maddox v. Odom, No. CA-94-1835-3-18BC (D.S.C. June 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.