Kevin Mccray, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Officer Harrell, in His Individual and Official Capacity,defendant-appellee, 73 F.3d 358 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseKevin McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., L. Hunter Limbaugh, Robert Thomas King, Willcox, McLeod, Buyck, Baker & Williams, P.A., Florence, SC, for Appellee.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Harrell, No. CA-94-2338-6-3AK (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
