Kevin Mccray, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Officer Harrell, in His Individual and Official Capacity,defendant-appellee, 73 F.3d 358 (4th Cir. 1995)Annotate this Case
Submitted: December 14, 1995. Decided: December 21, 1995
Kevin McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., L. Hunter Limbaugh, Robert Thomas King, Willcox, McLeod, Buyck, Baker & Williams, P.A., Florence, SC, for Appellee.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Harrell, No. CA-94-2338-6-3AK (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.