Charles Jerome Adams, Claimant-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 73 F.3d 356 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseCharles Jerome Adams, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his Rule 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Adams v. United States, No. CA-94-363-1-6BD (D.S.C. Jun. 21, 1994 & Aug. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
