Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.ronald Lewis Duck, Plaintiff-appellant, v. M.l. Warren, Defendant-appellee,andcity of Norfolk, Party in Interest, 67 F.3d 294 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseRonald Lewis Duck, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Brody Rashkind, Furniss, Davis, Rashkind & Saunders, Norfolk, VA; Harold Phillip Juren, Deputy City Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellees.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint pursuant to a jury verdict. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. Duck v. Warren, No. CA94-767-2 (E.D. Va. March 24, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
