United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Daniel John Keefer, Defendant-appellant, 66 F.3d 336 (9th Cir. 1995)

MEMORANDUM^* 

Daniel John Keefer appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss the superseding indictment, arguing that a prior civil administrative forfeiture proceeding bars his subsequent criminal prosecution on double jeopardy grounds. Double jeopardy did not attach to the instant prosecution because Keefer made no claim to any property in the civil forfeiture proceeding, see United States v. Cretacci, --- F.3d ----, ----, No. 94-10235, slip op. 9565, 9568 (9th Cir. Aug. 4 1995), and because, as to part of the property involved, there was no finality to the prior proceeding, see United States v. Sanchez-Cobarruvias, --- F.3d ----, ----, No. 94-50581, slip op. ----, ---- (9th Cir. Sept. 12, 1995). We find Keefer's remaining arguments meritless.

AFFIRMED.