Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.david R. Redmond; Terry K. Pressley; Paul Mincey;kamathene Adonia Cooper; Stacy L. Ford; Charles Underwood;timothy Wellington; Jerry N. Kelleher; Carlos Elliott;john Brown, Plaintiffs-appellants,andwilliam Hall; Gary Stegall; Gregory T. Bennett; Royowens; Plaintiffs, v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company; South Carolinadepartment of Corrections, Defendants-appellees, 66 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseDavid R. Redmond, Terry K. Pressley, Paul Mincey, Kamathene Adonia Cooper, Stacy L. Ford, Charles Underwood, Timothy Wellington, Jerry N. Kelleher, Carlos Elliott, John Brown, Appellants Pro Se.
Barbara Murcier Bowens, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Redmond v. AT & T, No. CA-94-1089-3-17AK (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
