Donald R. Johnson, Claimant-appellant, v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-appellee, 65 F.3d 187 (Fed. Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 65 F.3d 187 (Fed. Cir. 1995) Aug. 16, 1995

Before MICHEL, Circuit Judge, BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.


ORDER

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(e) and to dismiss Donald R. Johnson's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Johnson opposes.

In 1991, Johnson filed a request to reopen his claim for entitlement to service connection for aggravation of a pre-existing psychiatric disorder. The Board of Veterans Appeals denied his claim on the ground that the evidence submitted by Johnson was neither new nor material. The Court of Veterans Appeals summarily affirmed the Board's decision. Johnson appealed to this court.

Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court may review only challenges to the validity or interpretation of a statute or regulation, or to the interpretation of a constitutional provision, that the Court of Veterans Appeals relied on in its decision. If an appeal to this court from the Court of Veterans Appeals does not challenge the validity or interpretation of a statute or regulation, or the interpretation of a constitutional provision, Sec. 7292(d) requires this court to dismiss the appeal. That section states that this court "may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case."

In his informal brief, Johnson does not challenge the validity or interpretation of a statute or regulation or the interpretation of a constitutional provision. Thus, this appeal must be dismissed. See Livingston v. Derwinski, 959 F.2d 224, 225-26 (Fed. Cir. 1992).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary's motion to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(e) is granted.

(2) The Secretary's motion to dismiss is granted.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.