Samuel Howard, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James Potter and Charles L. Wolff, Jr., Defendants-appellees, 65 F.3d 175 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 65 F.3d 175 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. *Decided Aug. 22, 1995

Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Nevada state prisoner Samuel Howard appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in Howard's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir. 1992). We have reviewed the record, and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion filed on July 18, 1994.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3