Doris Kirkpatrick, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department Ofcorrections; Larry Batson, Legal Advisor, Southcarolina Department of Corrections;michael J. Cavanaugh,commissioner,defendants-appellees, 60 F.3d 823 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseDoris Kirkpatrick, Appellant Pro Se.
James M. Brailsford, III, E. Meredith Manning, ROBINSON, MCFADDEN & MOORE, P.C., Columbia, SC; Larry Cleveland Batson, Robert Eric Petersen, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, SC; Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting in part the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kirkpatrick v. Evatt, No. CA-92-3130-3-22-A (D.S.C. Feb. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
