United States of America, Plaintiff--appellee, v. Charles Anderson Miller, Defendant--appellant, 59 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseCharles Anderson Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Daniel Potter, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We note that the current version of Rule 35 is applicable to this Appellant and provides no vehicle for challenging an allegedly illegal sentence
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.