United States of America, Plaintiff--appellee, v. Sandra Thornal, Defendant--appellant, 59 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 1995)Annotate this Case
Sandra Thornal, Appellant Pro Se. J. Brady Hair, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, SC, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, C.J., and BUTZNER, Sr. C.J.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thornal, Nos. CR-92-253; CA-93-2584-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Nov. 23, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.