Leonard Clay, Plaintiff--appellant, v. State of South Carolina; South Carolina Department Ofprobation, Parole, and Pardon Services;commissioner, South Carolina Departmentof Probation, Parole Andpardon Services,defendants--appellees, 59 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 59 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: May 18, 1995. Decided: June 22, 1995

Leonard Clay, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina; Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clay v. State of South Carolina, No. CA-94-964 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.