United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Timothy C. Pigford; Clara B. Pigford, Defendants-appellants, 57 F.3d 1067 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseTimothy C. Pigford, Clara B. Pigford, Appellants Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment in this civil forfeiture action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Pigford, No. CA92-174 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We also deny Appellants' motion for appointment of counsel
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.