United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ivan Lee Hairston, Defendant-appellant, 57 F.3d 1067 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseIvan Lee Hairston, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hairston, Nos. CR-92-85-R; CA-94-64-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED
We also deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and for preparation of a transcript at government expense pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1988)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
