Timothy Waddell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Steven T. Harris, Counselor; C. Hester, Assistantwarden-treatment; William P. Rogers, Regionaladministrator; Norman Rice, Lieutenant; Charles Thompson,warden; E.a. Tuck, Sergeant; Sylvia Whitten, Grievancecoordinator; B. Patillo, Correctional Officer, Defendants-appellees, 57 F.3d 1067 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 57 F.3d 1067 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: April 20, 1995Decided: June 9, 1995

Timothy Waddell, appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.*  We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Waddell v. Harris, No. CA-94-22-R (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The parties consented to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.