Anthony Solimine, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Ortho Mcneil, et al., Defendants, Appellees, 56 F.3d 59 (1st Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseAnthony Solimine on brief pro se.
D. Mass.
AFFIRMED.
Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, SELYA and BOUDIN Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We have reviewed appellant's brief and the record on appeal. We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum, dated April 26, 1994.
Appellant's "motion for leave to file up to ten (10) page memorandum on supplemental authorities and an appendix" and "motion for leave to file brief memorandum of supplemental authorities" are denied. They are extremely tardy and, in any event, present nothing of merit.
Appellant's motion for oral argument is denied.
The district court's order of dismissal is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
