United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ernest Luckett, Defendant-appellant, 54 F.3d 774 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 54 F.3d 774 (4th Cir. 1995)

Submitted April 20, 1995. Decided May 18, 1995


Ernest Luckett, Appellant Pro Se. David Alan Graham, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Luckett, Nos. CR-90-93; CA-93-223-P (W.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED