Jack Sturtevant, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Howmet Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 53 F.3d 332 (6th Cir. 1995)

Plaintiff, Jack Sturtevant, appeals from an order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendant, Howmet Corporation, on his claims that Howmet breached a promise of employment and discriminated against him based upon his age.

Having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant.

Because the reasons judgment should be entered for defendant have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by that court in its Opinion dated January 3, 1994.