Jack Ray Vigue, Plaintiff--appellant, v. G. P. Dodson; D. Braxton; Maggie Watkins; Randalljackson; Susie Cox; Mickey Blansatt; Captain Hintz;tracy Ray; Sergeant Fleming; Lieutenant Summey; Sergeanteasterling; Turner, Correctional Officer; Mcclanahan,correctional Officer; Ellis B. Wright; F. Spence;lieutenant Healey; Sergeant Winstead; James A. Smith;edward Murray; Edward C. Morris; Richard A. Young; Doctorquinones; Virginia Smith, Head Nurse; Nurse Lester; Nurserose; Nurse Ball; Nurse Ramey; J.v. Beale; Nursesutherland, Defendants--appellees,andnurse Coleman, Defendant, 51 F.3d 270 (4th Cir. 1995)

Jack Ray Vigue, a Virginia prisoner, appeals the dismissal, without prejudice, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action. Vigue's complaint was dismissed after he failed to comply with the district court's order instructing Vigue to submit a verified statement that he had exhausted his administrative remedies, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (1988).

We have examined the grounds for dismissal and determine that Vigue can save this action by amending his complaint in compliance with the district court's order.^*  Therefore, under Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993), the dismissal order which Vigue seeks to challenge is not appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss Vigue's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED