United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Yuri T. Southerland, Defendant-appellant, 51 F.3d 269 (4th Cir. 1995)Annotate this Case
Yuri T. Southerland, Appellant Pro Se. William A. Brafford, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Southerland, Nos. CR-92-292; CA-94-60-3-P (W.D.N.C. July 18, 1994). We further deny Appellant's motion for oral argument and we dispense with argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.