United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Eliseo Encarncacion, Defendant-appellant, 50 F.3d 8 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseEliseo Encarnacion, Appellant Pro Se.
Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Encarnacion, Nos. CR-92-96-MU; CA-94-167-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 20, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED
We deny Encarnacion's motion to remand to the district court, but note that he may file a motion for relief in the district court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
