James Howard Hensley, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Roy H. Patton, Jr., Defendant-appellee, 50 F.3d 6 (4th Cir. 1995)Annotate this Case
Submitted Feb. 16, 1995. Decided March 23, 1995
James Howard Hensley, appellant pro se.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hensley v. Patton, No. CA-94-237 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.