United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jerry Lee France, Defendant-appellant, 48 F.3d 1229 (9th Cir. 1995)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 48 F.3d 1229 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted Feb. 21, 1995. *Decided Feb. 27, 1995

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Jerry Lee France appeals the district court's revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the Double Jeopardy Clause barred the revocation of his supervised release for having committed two bank robberies because he had already been prosecuted for the bank robberies in a separate criminal proceeding. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Soto-Olivas, No. 93-50863, slip op. 115 (9th Cir. Jan. 5, 1995), in which we held that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not preclude criminal prosecution for conduct that also serves as the basis for a revocation of supervised release.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.