United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Melvin Lee Sharp, Defendant-appellant, 48 F.3d 1218 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseMelvin Lee Sharp, Appellant pro se.
Paul Arthur Billups, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, WV, for Appellee.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sharp, Nos. CR-90-255; CA-93-634-3 (S.D.W. Va. May 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
