Wayne N. Cunday, Claimant-appellant, v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-appellee, 47 F.3d 1181 (Fed. Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 47 F.3d 1181 (Fed. Cir. 1995) Jan. 12, 1995

6 Vet. App. 569.

DISMISSED.

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.


ORDER

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(e) and to dismiss Wayne N. Cunday's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Cunday has not filed a response.

In 1993, the Board of Veterans Appeals denied Mr. Cunday's claim for entitlement to service connection for a gastrointestinal disability and denied him a permanent and total disability rating for pension purposes. On June 30, 1994, the Court of Veterans Appeals affirmed the Board's decision.

Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court may review only challenges to the validity or interpretation of a statute or regulation, or on constitutional grounds. Section 7292(d) states that this court "may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case."

In his informal brief, Mr. Cunday states, inter alia, that he was not permitted to present evidence before the Board and that the Court of Veterans Appeals was prejudiced against him. The Board had twice remanded to the agency to consider Mr. Cunday's evidence. The government states that Mr. Cunday twice refused to cooperate with the agency. Mr. Cunday does not contradict these events. Thus he has not presented a colorable claim of constitutional or procedural violation. Consequently, pursuant to Sec. 7292(d), this court is without jurisdiction and this appeal must be dismissed. See Livingston v. Derwinski, 959 F.2d 224, 225-26 (Fed. Cir. 1992).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary's motion to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(e) is granted.

(2) The Secretary's motion to dismiss is granted.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.