United States of America v. Martin Mayhew, Also Known As Marty, Appellant, 44 F.3d 1031 (D.C. Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Columbia, No. 92cr00010-07; Thomas Penfield Jackson, Judge.
D.D.C.
AFFIRMED.
BEFORE: WALD,* HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed February 25, 1994, be affirmed. The district court correctly applied the sentencing guidelines and appellant's other claims are without merit.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
PER CURIAM.
Judge Wald would remand for further proceedings appellant's allegation that trial counsel refused to note an appeal
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
