Melvin P. Deutsch, Appellant, v. J. Richardson, Unit Manager, Fci Schuylkill, et al, 44 F.3d 1031 (D.C. Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 44 F.3d 1031 (D.C. Cir. 1995) Dec. 28, 1994. Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In BancDenied Feb. 22, 1995

Before: GINSBURG, SENTELLE, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. The court has concluded that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the order of the district court filed June 14, 1994, be affirmed, substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Appellant's complaint was properly dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Rule 41.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.