United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Danny Gonzales Garza, Defendant-appellee, 43 F.3d 1480 (9th Cir. 1994)

Before POOLE and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge.^* 

ORDER

Having considered the Supplemental Statement of Reasons, we hold that the district court adequately explained the extent of its departure from the United States Sentencing Guidelines in sentencing defendant Garza. Because we have previously found the departure was authorized pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b) and U.S.S.G. Sec. 5K2.0, and because the extent of the departure was reasonable, see United States v. Martinez-Gonzalez, 962 F.2d 874, 876 (9th Cir. 1992), we hereby AFFIRM.