Charlotte Mance, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of Arizona; Scottsdale Serrento Apartments,defendants-appellees, 40 F.3d 1246 (9th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseBefore: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Charlotte Mance appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction over Mance's action, challenging the Arizona Supreme Court's denial of her petition which sought review of a forcible detainer action, wherein Mance was evicted from her apartment at the Scottsdale Serrento Apartments. The district court correctly held that it lacked jurisdiction to review an appeal from a state court decision. See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983).1
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, Mance's motion for oral argument is denied
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Mance's motion to enter exhibit copies in lieu of original exhibits is denied
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
