James N. Keeler, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Robert L. Stoddard, Attorney; Horace C. Smith, Attorney,defendants Appellees, 39 F.3d 1177 (4th Cir. 1994)Annotate this Case
Submitted: September 26, 1994Decided: October 27, 1994
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-744)
James N. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert L. Stoddard, Moore, Stoddard, Stoddard & Wood, Spartanburg, South Carolina; Horace C. Smith, Whiteside, Smith, Jones & Duncan, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Keeler v. Stoddard, No. CA-94-744 (D.S.C. May 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.