United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Richard Hanley, Defendant Appellant, 38 F.3d 1213 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 38 F.3d 1213 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted: Aug. 25, 1994. Decided: Oct. 13, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-109)

Richard Hanley, apellant pro se. Brian Joseph Lauri, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for return of his suspended license and request for correction of his Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles records. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  United States v. Hanley, No. CR-93-109 (E.D. Va. June 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

In light of our disposition of the appeal, we deny Appellant's motion for stay pending appeal. To the extent Appellant's motion can be construed as a motion to expedite, we deny the motion as moot

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.