Michael Arthur Henderson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America; State of Kansas; and James F.rueger, the Adjutant General, Defendants-appellees, 35 F.3d 574 (10th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseBefore SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT1
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff Michael Henderson, appearing pro se, appeals from the district court's dismissal of his civil rights suit. The district court granted Defendant United States' motion to dismiss the suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and granted the Defendants' State of Kansas and James F. Rueger's motion for summary judgment. After reviewing the briefs of the parties, the district court's Order, and the record on appeal, we AFFIRM for substantially the reasons set forth in the district court's Order dated February 11, 1994.
AFFIRMED.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. --- F.R.D. ----
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
