Quinten L. Jackson, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Davis R. Ruark; Sampson G. Vincent; Patrick Tilghman; R.hunter Nelms; Christopher Welch, Defendants Appellees, 30 F.3d 129 (4th Cir. 1994)Annotate this Case
Submitted: June 23, 1994. Decided: July 14, 1994
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-92-3572-WN)
Quinten L. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Marlene Trestman, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Daniel Karp, Allen, Johnson, Alexander & Karp, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. Ruark, No. CA-92-3572-WN (D. Md. Dec. 8, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.