Kcs Energy Marketing, Inc., Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent, 28 F.3d 1295 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 28 F.3d 1295 (D.C. Cir. 1994) June 30, 1994

Before: WALD, RANDOLPH and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of the motion of respondent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to dismiss petition for review, and the opposition thereto; and the motion of KCS Energy, Inc. to hold in abeyance the pending petition for review, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted. Because petitioner sought rehearing of the order which it seeks to have this court review, the order is nonfinal and the petition for review is "incurably premature." TeleSTAR, Inc. v. FCC, 888 F.2d 132, 134 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (per curiam). In seeking rehearing, petitioner rendered the entire order nonfinal. Cf. Bellsouth Corp. v. FCC, 17 F.3d 1487, 1489-90 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (" [A]n agency action cannot be considered nonfinal for one purpose and final for another. Thus, once a party petitions the agency for reconsideration of an order or any part thereof, the entire order is rendered nonfinal as to that party."). Once respondent has decided petitioner's request for rehearing, petitioner may seek judicial review of that order as well as the orders at issue here. See Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. FERC, 9 F.3d 980, 981 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (per curiam). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to hold in abeyance be denied.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.