Frank Setola, et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Bob Schmidt Chevrolet, Inc., Hydra-matic Division, Andgeneral Motors Corp., Defendants-appellees, 27 F.3d 567 (6th Cir. 1994)

Plaintiffs appeal from orders of the district court granting summary judgment to defendants.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants.

As the reasons why judgment should be entered for defendants have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a full written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgments of the district court are affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its memorandum and order dated November 4, 1991, and its opinion and order dated October 14, 1992.