John Phillip Risley, Individually, J. Stephen Risley, Individually, et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Nissan Motor Corporation in Usa, a California Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 260 F.3d 1310 (11th Cir. 2001)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - 260 F.3d 1310 (11th Cir. 2001) August 9, 2001

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 98-00863-CV-J-16B); John H. Moore, II, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before BLACK and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and HANCOCK* , District Judge.

BLACK, Circuit Judge:


We sua sponte grant rehearing. Our prior opinion in this case construed Fla. Stat. § 320.643. See Risley v. Nissan Motor Corp. USA, 254 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. 2001). On June 8, 2001, the Governor of Florida signed Fla. Laws ch. 2001-196, which amends, inter alia, Fla. Stat. § 320.643. These amendments pertain, in part, to the procedural steps for filing a complaint with the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. See Fla. Laws ch. 2001-196, § 23. Regardless, the amendments do not alter our holding or reasoning in this case, because, as noted in our prior opinion, the events here are governed by the 1997 version of the Florida Statutes. See Risley, 254 F.3d at 1297 n. 1; see also Barry Cook Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 616 So. 2d 512, 517 n. 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Therefore, our prior opinion is REINSTATED.

 *

Honorable James H. Hancock, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.