Harry Edward Burnsworth, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mary Pick, Defendant-appellee, 26 F.3d 129 (9th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 26 F.3d 129 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted May 24, 1994. *Decided June 9, 1994

Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Harry E. Burnsworth, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Mary Pick, a prison nurse, in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We review de novo, Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1018 (9th Cir. 1991), and we affirm.

Burnsworth contends that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated because Nurse Pick was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. We disagree. In an order filed on August 6, 1993, the district court granted Pick's motion for summary judgment. We affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough and well-reasoned order.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.