Larry D. Cannon, Appellant, v. Peter Jackson, Administrator, Community Correctional Center, 25 F.3d 1115 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 25 F.3d 1115 (D.C. Cir. 1994) June 2, 1994

Before: EDWARDS, WILLIAMS, and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of the motion for appointment of counsel and request for expedition, and the motion for summary affirmance and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The district court did not err in denying Cannon's motion for preliminary injunction. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the request for expedition be dismissed as moot.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.